The Second American Civil War

It's nonviolent but it's real.
Americans: we are fighting a war to defend our country's basic values, character, and principles. The organizational culture or, if you prefer, the soul of our nation is at stake.
This Page
Site Map
  • Defining a new political spectrum: Libertarian versus Servile or Coercive Collectivist
  • The story of Horatius Cocles ("The One-Eyed"): three of us (Libertarians, Republicans) are worth 90,000 of them (coercive collectivists and Serviles)
  • Letters to the editor (with word counts) for your use
  • Republican/Libertarian Politics main page: Dem-olish the Democrats before they demolish the United States.
    • What is the enemy trying to achieve?
    In one sentence: "A higher, nobler, and kinder world based on the sanctity of the Crowd and the villainy of the single person"-- with themselves as the demagogues in charge of the Crowd, of course.
    The enemy is trying to change the basic and underlying character of the United States, to remold its citizens' values and principles. These are currently:
    Self-reliance, self-ownership, independence, and a sense of personal responsibility.
    The enemy wishes to change the nation's culture to one of:
    Infantile reliance on government and social institutions (which the enemy seeks to control), childlike dependence, and lack of personal responsibility (victim mentality)
    Henry Ford and his associates-- the people who made the United States into the most prosperous, affluent, and powerful nation on earth-- identified this threat more than three-quarters of a century ago. (Emphasis is mine)
    When you get a whole country— as did ours— thinking that Washington is a sort of heaven and behind its clouds dwell omniscience and omnipotence, you are educating that country into a dependent state of mind which augers ill for the future. (Henry Ford, My Life and Work, 1922, p. 7)

    The welfare of the people became a direct responsibility of government, whereas before then government was the responsibility of the people. American thought and outlook were altered. Large segments of our people were willing to exchange personal freedom for a sense of social security (Charles E. Sorensen, 1956, My Forty Years with Ford, p. 253).

    The largest single cause of poverty in Europe since the [First World] war has been the abject dependence upon government to do what government cannot do. The irony of this system is that the government which adopts it must continue to do more and more; and as the demand for more increases, the ability to do anything decreases. For there is nothing in government that does not come from the people; and a people in whom the spirit of self-help is killed contribute less and less to that which they desire until in the end both people and government fall into a common helplessness (Henry Ford, 1926, Today and Tomorrow).

    Rudyard Kipling also identified this agenda in his science fiction story "As Easy as ABC" (1912)
    The story is set in the year 2065, and the world's only government is the Aerial Board of Control. "The A.B.C., that semi-elected, semi-nominated body of a few score persons, controls the Planet. Transportation is Civilization, our motto runs. Theoretically, we do what we please, so long as we do not interfere with the traffic and all it implies."
    Among the worst offenses in this Utopian civilization is "crowd-making and invasion of privacy." This meant that the lives and activities of "self-owning men and women" "should be submitted for decision at any time... to anybody who happened to be passing by or residing in a certain radius, and that everybody should forthwith abandon his concerns to settle the matter, first by crowd-making, next by talking to the crowds made, and lastly by describing crosses on pieces of paper, which rubbish should later be counted with certain mystic ceremonies and oaths. Out of this amazing play... would automatically arise a higher, nobler, and kinder world, ... based on the sanctity of the Crowd and the villainy of the single person."
    This is the position of the Coercive Collectivist, whether Fascist, Communist, Socialist, Nazi, or even Bill Clinton Democrat: "a higher, nobler, and kinder world based on the sanctity of the Crowd and the villainy of the single person."
    Who is the Enemy?
    Today's so-called Liberals are anything but liberals. They are coercive collectivists or Serviles, people who believe in "a higher, nobler, and kinder world based on the sanctity of the Crowd and the villainy of the single person"-- with themselves as the demagogues who lead the mob, of course. There is a certain class of people in this country who feel that they, as members of the limousine liberal aristocracy and wealthy elite, are somehow fit to run other people's lives. They are the enemy.
    From A Note on Labels: Why "Libertarian"?: "In the 1820s the representatives of the middle class in the Spanish Cortes, or parliament, came to be called the Liberales. They contended with the Serviles, the 'servile ones,' who represented the nobles and the absolute monarchy. The term Serviles, for those who advocate state power over individuals, unfortunately didn't stick. But the word liberal, for the defenders of liberty and the rule of law, spread rapidly. The Whig party in England came to be called the Liberal party. Today we know the philosophy of John Locke, Adam Smith, Thomas Jefferson, and John Stuart Mill as liberalism."

    REAL Liberals (Liberales) are therefore Libertarians! The people who call themselves liberals are coercive collectivists or Serviles.

    Specific tools that the enemy uses to undermine American culture and values

    This is a good checklist for identifying the enemy. Any politician who supports one of these agendas is likely to be a coercive collectivist and anyone who supports two or more is obviously a coercive collectivist. There are some exceptions but most gun control supporters, for example, also support higher taxes and more government control over other aspects of people's lives.
     

    Gun Control

    This ties in with the idea that people do not have the responsibility or right to protect themselves from criminals, and with the goal of giving the government a monopoly on the means of violence. 
    Social Security (mandatory participation)

    The collectivists, Tom Daschle (D-SD) in particular, guard government control over your retirement very jealously. The government forces you to "contribute" to this criminally fraudulent pyramid scheme throughout your working life so that, when you retire, the Collectivists can buy your vote by generously returning some of your own money to you. The government also wants to retain control over how much you can earn as a retiree by holding the power to punish you (by withholding or taxing benefits) if you disobey.
    Zero Tolerance in Schools

    This does not mean zero tolerance for violent behavior but rather zero tolerance for peaceful expression of politically-incorrect ideas. Our public schools now punish students for drawing pictures of guns or of soldiers with guns because they've adopted the Collectivist mission of teaching impressionable children that guns and gun ownership are bad.
    Affirmative Action

    The Collectivists use affirmative action to keep minorities subservient to them and to buy minority votes. Affirmative action fosters servile dependence among minorities by teaching them that they're victims (victim mentality) who can't get anywhere without Collectivist largesse.
    The United Nations

    The United Nations is a useful mechanism for imposing foreign value systems-- such as "norms of civilian non-possession of firearms" (another term for "giving governments, including genocidal dictatorships, monopolies on firearms)-- on the United States. Many Americans, unfortunately, respect this so-called world organization. The UN also is pushing the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty (or Kyoto Protocol) on the U.S. to help transfer American manufacturing jobs to places like Mainland China.
    Socialized Medicine

    Specific enemies of American culture, principles, and values
     

    Collectivist Politicians

    The dregs of the United States Senate:

    Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
    Hillary Clinton ("Hillary Arafat Clinton") (D-NY)

    Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
    Tom Daschle (D-SD)
    Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
    Charles Schumer ("Putzhead") (D-NY)
    Note that most of these scum were elected by pay-more-get-less high-tax, high cost of living, gun control states like California, New York, and New Jersey.
    • William Jefferson Clinton, aka BlowJobBilly, who turned the acronym POTUS from "President of the United States" into "P***s of the United States."
    • Albert Gore, quit divinity school with a D- average (five Fs, a couple of Ds, and a C-), his friends say Bush is stupid???
    When in doubt, vote them out!
    Racial Demagogues

    Jesse Jackson, the new face of the Democratic Party

    A kinder, gentler plantation, with Jesse as one of the overseers

    Al Sharpton, another new face of the Democratic Party

    Pushing the drug of dependency and victim mentality to Blacks

    Tell us again how many honkies whites raped Tawana Brawley, Al. Did Elvis rape Tawana Brawley, Al? Also, isn't your line "No justice, no peace?" Sharptonese for "Juden Raus!" ("Jews Out!") as in the Crown Heights riot and the burning of Freddy's Fashion Market?

     
    Limousine Liberal Elitists
    Rosie O'Donnell. Rosie says, "You aren't allowed to own a gun but I am." It speaks for itself; the wealthy elite, aristocrats like Rosie O'Donnell are entitled to special privileges.
    Self-Proclaimed Labor Leaders

    As identified by Henry Ford (Ford Ideals, 1922): "A spokesperson who does not work in the shop, who does not work in any shop, whose sole ambition perhaps is to never again have to work in a shop, is usually the [collective] 'bargainer,'"

    Not your local shop steward, but rather a national "labor leader" with a six- or seven-figure salary (supported by your union dues) who won't touch anything heavier than a cocktail glass or hors d' ouevres toothpick when he meets with Democratic politicians. Things like machine tools, forklifts, and the like are for people like us, not him.

    Letters to the editor and friendly discussions with union members will be helpful here.

    What can we do to resist?

    Letters to the editor for your paraphrasing and extraction. I wrote them and I will place them in the public domain. They are designed specifically to expose these enemies for what they are.

    The Stentorian's politics page