Gun Control Laws and Your Rights as a Juror

#1 in a series of information leaflets from The Stentorian, www.stentorian.com
(C) 1999, William A. Levinson. Permission is granted to print, copy, and distribute hard (non-electronic) copies of this page freely and without royalties of any kind, provided that it is not altered in any manner. The page is formatted so it will fit on a single 8.5 by 11 inch sheet. It may be photocopied, folded in thirds, taped to form a letter-sized piece, and mailed to anyone whom you think it would interest- and they are encouraged to similarly copy and distribute it.

The author is not a lawyer, and nothing on this page constitutes legal advice. It is, however, common sense. If you are selected for jury duty in a case that involves the violation of a state, Federal, or municipal gun control law by an otherwise law-abiding citizen, you should exercise your right as a juror to nullify, or refuse to enforce, the law; to quote Mr. Bumble from Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist and say, "The law is an ass." (This is not advice to violate any law; this is a suggestion that juries nullify certain laws.)
Courts across the country have ruled that police have no duty to protect individual citizens. During the Los Angeles riots, the Los Angeles Police Department told citizens, "You're on your own." Under David Dinkins' administration, police did not respond to desperate 911 calls from Jews during the riots in Crown Heights. A basic foundation of our country- the Declaration of Independence- says that, when governments refuse to protect their citizens' natural rights to life, liberty, and property, they forfeit all claims to their citizens' obedience.
 The writings of John Locke (1632-1704) lie behind the origin of the United States and the United States Constitution. 

"Men in the 'state of nature' were reasonable and well-disposed, willing to get along with each other though handicapped by the absence of public authority. Men likewise had a moral sense, quite independent of government; and they also possessed by nature certain rights, quite apart from the state. These rights were the rights to life, liberty, and property."
"They cannot by their own efforts protect what is 'proper' to them, i.e. their property. They agree to set up government to enforce observance of the rights of all. Government is thus created by a contract, but the contract is not unconditional. It imposes mutual obligations. The people must be reasonable; only rational beings can be politically free. ... On government, also, certain conditions and obligations are imposed. If a government breaks the contract, if it threatens the natural rights which it is the sole purpose of government to protect, if, for example, it takes away a man's property without his consent, then the governed have a right to reconsider what they have done in creating the government and may even in the last extremity rebel against it." (Source: Colton and Palmer, 1971, A History of the Modern World. New York: Alfred Knopf. Page 320)

The Declaration of Independence was almost paraphrased from Locke:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. 

In summary, the ballot box is the primary means of assuring that the government does what we the people created it to do, but the jury box is another. Authority and responsibility go hand in hand; when government disclaims its responsibility, jurors can and should strip it of its authority by refusing to enforce its dictates.

Jurors have no obligation to enforce laws they consider unjust (or preferentially enforced, e.g. affluent "liberals" like Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) can and do use their influence to obtain gun permits). For more information, contact the Fully Informed Jury Association (FIJA) at 800-TEL-JURY. Also, "Can You Get a Fair Trial in America," by attorney Daniel J. Schultz, available from the Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), P.O. Box 270143, Hartford, WI 53027, 414-673-9745. The Stentorian does not represent FIJA or JPFO, but recommends these organizations as information sources.