The following material is most of what I sent to the FEC.
It
is not a judgment, decision, or ruling by the Federal Election Commission
or any other agency. However, the Million Mom March recently removed
all candidates from its Apple
Pie Award page, to leave only Bill Clinton, who is not running for
anything (except perhaps for disbarment in his home state, which doesn't
count). Complaints
were also sent to the Internal Revenue Service because 501(c)(3) tax exempt
organizations are not allowed to influence Federal elections.
| From: William A. Levinson
[contact information given] |
To:
Federal Election Commission 999 E Street NW Washington, DC 20463 |
Unless they're retiring from the House, the U.S. Representatives on the Million Mom March's "Apple Pie Award" page are running for reelection this November. The page praises Joe Hoeffel (D-PA), Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY), and Connie Morella, (R-MD). Also, the Million Mom March's "Time Out Chair" page, until recently, condemned House Minority Whip Tom DeLay (R-TX). If these pages serve to "influence a Federal election" under FEC standards, the Million Mom March's acceptance of corporate contributions appear to comprise a violation.
Furthermore, the Million Mom March was, until no earlier than April 28 (I believe it was actually until May 13), representing itself as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization. Since 501(c)(3) organizations cannot engage in political activity or endorse candidates, I reported this, with supporting documents, to the Internal Revenue Service, TE/GE Division, Customer Service, P.O. Box 2508, Cincinnati, OH 45201.
[The following statement was notarized]
Responding to Mr. DeLay's remarks that "This House is a Pro-Gun House," Rene King of Kentucky wrote:
Thank you sir, for telling us. We were under the impression that the House of Representatives was a pro-constituents House.
According to the Gallup Polls done in August, 66% of Americans (including 52% of the Republicans) favored common sense gun laws but this doesn't matter according to the very Honorable Mr. Delay, who, by the way has a government paid bodyguard, a luxury our defenseless children do not have. They are a pro-gun House even after Paducah, Columbine, Granada Hills, and Fort Worth. After all the dead children, the children who are scarred inside and out, he says with pride that the United States House of Representatives belongs to the pro-gun lobbyists. This House, claims Mr. Delay, refuses to yield to the whims of the populace.
We owe you a great debt, Mr. Delay, for telling us in another recent article in the New York Times that this House has been bought and paid for by lobbyists. How much is a child's life worth nowadays, Mr. Delay? Was the Representative's salary not enough to garner their loyalty?
Well, you've been honest, so I think we should be honest with you. Issues such as mandatory gun show background checks; safety locks on guns; and the registration of all firearms are important to the parents of this country. In fact, its going to be a deciding issue for 65% of the public.
According to Mr. Delay, it's not up to the people, lobbyists call the shots.
You stand by your guns, Mr. Delay. Come Mothers' Day, we mothers will stand together on the mall of Capitol Hill to remind your PRO-GUN House that on Election Day, the voters will stand by our children.
Sincerely,
R. King
enclosures: http://www.millionmommarch.com/html/pies.html, 3 pages, 6/13/00, 6:39 P.M.
http://www.duluthnews.com/dnt/us/artrev8.htm,
3 pages, 6/13/00, 6:55 P.M.
| From: William A. Levinson
[contact information given] |
To: Federal Election Commission
999 E Street NW Washington, DC 20463 certified mail Z 070 314 144 |
cc: (letter only, no enclosures)
Wayne LaPierre 11250 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, VA 22030-9400 Z 376 860 720 |
This addendum alleges that electioneering activities took place at the Million Mom March (a project of the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt Bell Campaign) event on Mother's Day. It also names four potential additional respondents. All of them gave speeches, at a 501(c)(3)-sponsored event, that involved exhortations to turn out and vote for candidates who support gun control. The three politicians support this position themselves.
Per your Web page http://www.fec.gov/pages/complain.htm#anchor460355, I should "Differentiate between statements based on the complainant's (the person who files the complaint) personal knowledge and those based on information and belief. Statements not based on personal knowledge should identify the source of the information."
[the following was notarized]
Based on my personal knowledge:
These items involve transcripts of speeches from the Million Mom March event in Washington, DC, on Mother's Day. My opinion is that they include remarks that can easily be construed as urging the audience to vote for candidates who support a specific position. I believe that Mr. Yoffie's remark about "a leader who will take on the fanatics and support sensible gun control" refers to a specific Presidential candidate, as does Ms. Wright's, "We will make sure that the NRA does not have an office in the White House come this November." I can attest that I printed these pages from the Million Mom March's own Web site today (July 26).
William A. Levinson
P. S.
On a personal note, I sympathize with the personal tragedies that affected
the lives of some of these speakers, and I realize that this complaint
may seem callous. However, the gun rights side also can cite tragedies
that it believes could have been prevented by responsible gun ownership.
I do not believe that personal tragedies on either side of the gun control
debate excuse the participants from playing by the rules. As I understand
them, these rules say that one cannot use tax-deductible or corporate donations
to influence Federal elections.
| From: William A. Levinson
[contact information given] |
To: Internal Revenue Service
TE/GE Division, Customer Service P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45201 certified mail 7099 3220 0008 7131 7302 cc: Retha Dixon Docket Manager
|
Federal Election Commission: addendum to MUR 5033
This notarized statement attests that I downloaded the enclosed Web page from http://gore2000.org/womenforgore/index.html on 8/5/2000. The Web page from the Gore 2000 site contained this photo (converted to greyscale here for printing) that shows Tipper Gore in a Million Mom March T-shirt at the Mother's Day event in Washington. At that time, the Million Mom March was a project of the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt Bell Campaign.
[Picture is at http://gore2000.org/womenforgore/index.html]
[End of notarized statement to the Federal Election Commission]
Internal Revenue Service
I believe that the 501(c)(3) tax exempt Bell Campaign, of which the Million Mom March was a project, and which solicited and accepted corporate donations and tax-deductible donations, is in further violation of IRS regulations per the following. I have highlighted the applicable provisions.
N. ELECTION YEAR ISSUES
by Judith E. Kindell and John F. Reilly
10. May an IRC 501(c)(3) organization invite candidates to speak at its events?
An IRC 501(c)(3) organization may invite a candidate to speak at its events without being considered to have participated or intervened in a political campaign depending upon the facts and circumstances of the invitation. Candidates may be invited to speak at an event of an IRC 501(c)(3) organization either in their capacity as a candidate or in their individual capacity other than as a candidate. The facts and circumstances to be considered are dependent upon the capacity in which the candidate is invited to speak. … [My understanding of the material between these sections: if the person is invited as a candidate, opposing candidates must be invited as well and given an equal forum for their views.] …
When a candidate is invited to speak at an event in a capacity other than as a candidate, it is not necessary for the IRC 501(c)(3) organization to provide equal access to all candidates. However, the IRC 501(c)(3) organization must ensure that the candidate speaks only in the other capacity and not as a candidate, that no mention is made of the individual’s candidacy at the event, and that no campaign activity occurs in connection with the candidate’s attendance at the event. In addition, all communications regarding the candidate’s attendance at the event should clearly indicate the capacity in which the candidate is acting and should not mention the individual’s candidacy. Even if the candidate does not engage in any campaign activity at the event, if the primary purpose for the invitation to the candidate is to provide public exposure for the candidate, the IRC 501(c)(3) organization may be participating or intervening in a political campaign.
The enclosed Web page from http://gore2000.org/womenforgore/index.html, "Women for Gore Making the Winning Difference" shows a photo of Tipper Gore in a Million Mom March T-shirt at the Million Mom March (with Senator Barbara Mikulski). As I see it, Gore2000.org is using the tax-exempt 501(c)(3) Million Mom March as a photo opportunity to promote Albert Gore for President and, if Ms. Mikulski is up for reelection this year, her candidacy as well. Note that a sign in the background says, "vote" or "I vote." Other signs show the presence of the tax-exempt Bell Campaign (www.bellcampaign.org).
http://www.networksolutions.com/cgi-bin/whois/whois?STRING=gore2000.org;
the Web site, as of 8/5/2000, is registered to:
| Registrant: Gore 2000, Inc. (GORE31-DOM)
2410 Charlotte Avenue Nashville, TN 37223 US |
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Zone
Contact:
Ben, Green (BG7503) ben@MIN.NET Gore 2000 601 Mainstream Drive Nashville, TN 37228 615-340-2000 (FAX) 615-340-2000 |
| Regards,
William A. Levinson |
Enclosed: http://gore2000.org/womenforgore/index.html |